This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Fix breakpoint at *_start

From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 23:57:24 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix breakpoint at *_start
References: <20100404210751.GA21664@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201004042245.58720.pedro@codesourcery.com>

On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 23:45:58 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Sunday 04 April 2010 22:07:51, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > Bugreport has been kept updated by the courtesy of John Reiser since 2005.
> 
> What bug report?  A PR?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162775

But found now GDB PR 9436 for it.


> The need for -static is a test implementation detail on systems
> with a userspace dynamic loader Ã la ld.so.  Can I convince you
> to remove "static" from the test name?

Do those systems support (=ignore) the "-static" flag?


Thanks,
Jan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Fix breakpoint at *_start
  - From: Pedro Alves

References:
- [patch] Fix breakpoint at *_start
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch] Fix breakpoint at *_start
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]