Re: [rfa] gdb.base/volatile.exp / varargs.exp: replace send_gdb with gdb_test

[Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>]

On Thursday 20 May 2010 18:06:39, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > Yeah, I pointed this out before in that context, and also pointed
> > out in that context that for "set foo", we could try "show foo", and
> > confirm that what we tried to set actually was set.  Similarly
> > for any test that should produce no output and that has a
> > corresponding "state getter".
> 
> Makes total sense to me. It might be unfair to put that on Michael's
> shoulders for that patch, but if he's up for it, maybe as a followup
> patch...

To be clear, I wasn't suggesting that Michael implemented it
for this patch, or even that Michael himself did it.  I even
think that patches that replace send_gdb with gdb_test should
avoid doing more than just that.

-- 
Pedro Alves