This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: ping: [patch 5/6] testsuite: Fix prelink-support.exp without prelink installed


On Mon, 05 Jul 2010 19:40:15 +0200, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > Do you suggest /usr/sbin/prelink existence check, $PATH search (with
> > explicitly appended `/usr/sbin') or the current error message check?
> 
> I think it's fine to wait until we actually find a system where the
> current approach is not working. So:

OK...


> OK to commit.

Checked-in.


Thanks,
Jan


http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2010-07/msg00028.html

--- src/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog	2010/07/05 18:01:53	1.2374
+++ src/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog	2010/07/05 18:02:56	1.2375
@@ -1,6 +1,14 @@
 2010-07-05  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
 	    Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>
 
+	Cope with missing /usr/sbin/prelink.
+	* lib/prelink-support.exp (prelink_no):
+	<result == 1 && $output is "no such file or directory">: New.
+	(prelink_yes): Likewise.  Return on failed prelink_no.
+
+2010-07-05  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
+	    Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>
+
 	* gdb.base/attach-pie-misread.exp: Load prelink-support.exp.  Replace
 	build_executable by build_executable_own_libs.  Replace "prelink -R"
 	execution by a call of prelink_yes.  Comment why "prelink -r" needs no
--- src/gdb/testsuite/lib/prelink-support.exp	2010/07/05 18:01:53	1.1
+++ src/gdb/testsuite/lib/prelink-support.exp	2010/07/05 18:02:56	1.2
@@ -187,6 +187,30 @@
     set result [catch $command output]
     verbose -log "result is $result"
     verbose -log "output is $output"
+    if {$result == 1 && [regexp {^(couldn't execute "/usr/sbin/prelink[^\r\n]*": no such file or directory\n?)*$} $output]} {
+	# Without prelink, at least verify that all the binaries do not
+	# contain the  ".gnu.prelink_undo" section (which would mean that they
+	# have already been prelinked).
+	set test "$test (missing /usr/sbin/prelink)"
+	foreach bin [split $arg] {
+	    if [string match "-*" $bin] {
+		# Skip prelink options.
+		continue
+	    }
+	    set readelf_program [transform readelf]
+	    set command "exec $readelf_program -WS $bin"
+	    verbose -log "command is $command"
+	    set result [catch $command output]
+	    verbose -log "result is $result"
+	    verbose -log "output is $output"
+	    if {$result != 0 || [string match {* .gnu.prelink_undo *} $output]} {
+		fail "$test ($bin is already prelinked)"
+		return 0
+	    }
+	}
+	pass $test
+	return 1
+    }
     if {$result == 0 && $output == ""} {
 	verbose -log "$name has been now unprelinked"
 	set command "exec /usr/sbin/prelink -uN $arg"
@@ -217,7 +241,9 @@
     # Try to unprelink it first so that, if it has been already prelinked
     # before, we get a different address now, making the new result unaffected
     # by any previous prelinking.
-    prelink_no $arg "$name pre-unprelink"
+    if ![prelink_no $arg "$name pre-unprelink"] {
+	return 0
+    }
 
     set test "prelink $name"
 
@@ -239,6 +265,19 @@
     set result [catch $command output]
     verbose -log "result is $result"
     verbose -log "output is $output"
+    if {$result == 1 && [regexp {^(couldn't execute "/usr/sbin/prelink[^\r\n]*": no such file or directory\n?)*$} $output]} {
+	set test "$test (missing /usr/sbin/prelink)"
+
+	# We could not find prelink.  We could check whether $args is already
+	# prelinked but we don't, because:
+	#   - It is unlikely that someone uninstalls prelink after having
+	#     prelinked the system ld.so;
+	#   - We still cannot change its prelinked address.
+	# Therefore, we just skip the test.
+
+	xfail $test
+	return 0
+    }
     if {$result == 0 && $output == ""} {
 	pass $test
 	return 1


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]