This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] [Windows] fix format string for 64 bit var in gdbserver

From: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz at gmail dot com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 22:22:53 +0300
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [Windows] fix format string for 64 bit var in gdbserver
References: <AANLkTilqLsYAUtXVYK-DL-uDFyKVbsxEz2CmJyJoese7@mail.gmail.com> <201007171447.38746.vapier@gentoo.org> <AANLkTilD-biSeZN783Wo8IOiim2d1cb35Mbi4s5v8LiX@mail.gmail.com> <201007171515.57996.vapier@gentoo.org>

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Saturday, July 17, 2010 14:59:16 Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> ... which is non-intrusive and easy. However, as I reported here:
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-07/msg00254.html
>> ... paddress() truncates its arguments and should be fixed.
>
> sounds like that is the way to go. ?think long term & correct, and you should
> have easy going with getting changes merged.
> -mike
>

Thanks.  Is the paddress() fix I suggested correct and can be
applied, then?

--
Ozkan

References:
- [PATCH] [Windows] fix format string for 64 bit var in gdbserver
  - From: Ozkan Sezer
- Re: [PATCH] [Windows] fix format string for 64 bit var in gdbserver
  - From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: [PATCH] [Windows] fix format string for 64 bit var in gdbserver
  - From: Ozkan Sezer
- Re: [PATCH] [Windows] fix format string for 64 bit var in gdbserver
  - From: Mike Frysinger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]