This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] gdbserver: enum target_signal vs. int host_signal [Re: [patch] enum target_signal vs. int host_signal]

From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:16:19 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch] gdbserver: enum target_signal vs. int host_signal [Re: [patch] enum target_signal vs. int host_signal]
References: <20100724114208.GA8491@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201007242344.39745.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20100725093334.GA25366@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201007251105.03291.pedro@codesourcery.com>

On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:05:02 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Sunday 25 July 2010 10:33:34, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 00:44:39 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > > Currently, host signal.
> > 
> > Therefore OK to check-in?
> 
> Yes, thanks.

Checked-in:
	http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2010-07/msg00145.html


Thanks,
Jan

References:
- [patch] enum target_signal vs. int host_signal
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch] enum target_signal vs. int host_signal
  - From: Pedro Alves
- [patch] gdbserver: enum target_signal vs. int host_signal [Re: [patch] enum target_signal vs. int host_signal]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch] gdbserver: enum target_signal vs. int host_signal [Re: [patch] enum target_signal vs. int host_signal]
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]