This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: PR 9946 - template parameters


>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com> writes:

Daniel> I have no idea how this is going to interact with my patch to
Daniel> calculate template names when the compiler leaves out arguments from
Daniel> DW_AT_name; Pedro was looking at that, I think.  But you've got the
Daniel> moral advantage since you posted this :-)

:)

Not putting the arguments in DW_AT_name actually seems cleaner to me.
GCC is still not emitting everything, though, so I don't think we could
make it do that yet.

Daniel> I like a 14-bit field not at all.  Is it that size to soak up all
Daniel> available bits?

Yeah, just to avoid making the struct bigger than needed.
I'll turn it into a plain old int.

Thanks for looking at this.  I'm going to check it in today.

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]