This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: New ARI warning Sat Aug 14 01:53:52 UTC 2010


GDB Administrator wrote:

> 814a815,817

>> gdb/mi/mi-main.c:1512: code: sprintf: Do not use sprintf, instead use xstrprintf
> gdb/mi/mi-main.c:1512:	  sprintf (p, ', read_result->data[i]);

This warning is bogus in this context. How do I silence it?

>> gdb/mi/mi-main.c:1490: gettext: _ markup: All messages should be marked up with _.
> gdb/mi/mi-main.c:1490:    error ("Unable to read memory.");
>> gdb/mi/mi-main.c:1582: gettext: _ markup: All messages should be marked up with _.
> gdb/mi/mi-main.c:1582:    error ("mi_cmd_data_write_memory: Usage: [-o COLUMN_OFFSET] ADDR FORMAT
> WORD-SIZE VALUE."); 821a825
>> gdb/mi/mi-main.c:1738: gettext: _ markup: All messages should be marked up with _.
> gdb/mi/mi-main.c:1738:    error ("the specified thread group does not exist");

Of above warnings, only first appears to be added by a recent patch of mine,
while others were there all the time. That said, have we ever decided if MI
should try to i18n its error messages? At least some of messages, like
"Unable to read memory" above, can probably be shown to user -- except it's
so generic as to be useless. Some messages, clearly, indicate frontend
bugs and showing them to users, or l10n-ing, makes no sense.

Comments?

- Volodya





Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]