This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch 1/9]#2 Rename `enum target_signal' to target_signal_t

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
Cc: mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:08:50 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch 1/9]#2 Rename `enum target_signal' to target_signal_t
References: <20100830071040.GB6831@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201008300814.o7U8ECNZ009010@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20100830082407.GA6881@host1.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:24:07 +0200
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:14:12 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > The _t suffix is actually reserved by POSIX, so using it is actually a
> > bad idea.  Perhaps change it to gdb_target_signal, or just
> > target_signal (making it a typedef for an anonymous enum)?
> 
> I see too many types in GDB and everywhere ending with _t (ptid_t for all).

Right, and I didn't know it was reserved.  Mark, could you please
point to the Posix document (hopefully, freely accessible) which says
that?  TIA

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 1/9]#2 Rename `enum target_signal' to target_signal_t
  - From: Mark Kettenis

References:
- [patch 1/9]#2 Rename `enum target_signal' to target_signal_t
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch 1/9]#2 Rename `enum target_signal' to target_signal_t
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: [patch 1/9]#2 Rename `enum target_signal' to target_signal_t
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]