This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] tracepoint: fix tfile byte order issue


On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 18:28, Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 October 2010 09:49:58, Hui Zhu wrote:
>> I make a new patch change to use target_gdbarch and use
>> extract_signed_integer in signed value.
>>
>> And I found that tfile_trace_find define the size of a frame to a int:
>> int data_size;
>>
>> But I found that gdbserver/tracepoint.c:struct traceframe:
>> unsigned int data_size : 32;
>>
>> So I change this int to unsigned int.
>
> Thanks. ?It appears the format description in gdb.texinfo doesn't
> make that explicit, but indeed all sizes should be unsigned.
>
>> @@ -3665,6 +3665,9 @@ tfile_get_traceframe_address (off_t tfra
>> ? ? ?perror_with_name (trace_filename);
>> ? ?else if (gotten < 2)
>> ? ? ?error (_("Premature end of file while reading trace file"));
>> + ?tpnum = (short) extract_signed_integer ((gdb_byte *)&tpnum, 2,
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? gdbarch_byte_order
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (target_gdbarch));
>
> I don't think you need all the casts to short, int, etc.. anymore. ?Please
> add the missing space in the second cast: "(gdb_byte *) &tpnum" everywhere too.
>
> Otherwise okay. ?Thanks.
>
> --
> Pedro Alves
>

Thanks Pedro.  Fixed and checked in.

Hui


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]