Re: [rfc/rfa] Use ARM exception tables as GDB unwinder

["Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>]

Dan Jacobowitz wrote:
> No, this is not the case.  The linker is supposed to fix it up:
> 
> /* Scan .ARM.exidx tables, and create a list describing edits which should be
>    made to those tables, such that:
> 
>      1. Regions without unwind data are marked with EXIDX_CANTUNWIND entries.
>      2. Duplicate entries are merged together (EXIDX_CANTUNWIND, or unwind
>         codes which have been inlined into the index).
> 
>    If MERGE_EXIDX_ENTRIES is false, duplicate entries are not merged.
> 
>    The edits are applied when the tables are written
>    (in elf32_arm_write_section).
> */
> 
> If it's not doing that, we should figure out why - it can lead to
> crashes in libgcc, if the unwinder is invoked, rather than the correct
> failure to unwind.
> 
> I think 2.19 didn't do this but 2.20 did.

Well, the function elf32_arm_fix_exidx_coverage you refer to above is
never called for a relocatable link ...

Unfortunately, the glibc link process works like this (abbreviated):
 - build all the objects (some with exidx, some without)
 - collect objects into an archive libc_pic.a
 - do a relocatable link:  -o libc_pic.os -r --whole-archive libc_pic.a
 - build shared object: -o libc.so -shared ... libc_pic.os ... 

The relocatable link step concatenates the text sections of objects
with exidx and those without, but does not call any special fixup
routine, so no EXIDX_CANTUNWIND entries are inserted.

The shared object final link step *does* run the fixup routine, but
since it now only sees a single big text section, it doesn't fix up
anything ...

Bye,
Ulrich

-- 
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
  Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com