Re: [patch] Add tests for JIT debugging interface

[Yao Qi <yao at codesourcery dot com>]

On 01/11/2011 05:26 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> +
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> +  if (argc<  2)
> +    usage(argv[0]);
> +  else
> +    {
> +      const char *const libname = argv[1];
> +      int i, fd, count = 1;
> +      struct stat st;
> +
> +      if (argc>  2)
> +        count = atoi (argv[2]);
> +
> +      if ((fd = open (libname, O_RDONLY)) == -1)
> +        {
> +          fprintf (stderr, "open (\"%s\", O_RDONLY): %s\n", libname, strerror (errno));

This line is too long.

> +          exit (1);
> +        }
> +
> +      if (fstat (fd,&st) != 0)
> +        {
> +          fprintf (stderr, "fstat (\"%d\"): %s\n", fd, strerror (errno));
> +          exit (1);
> +        }
> +
> +      for (i = 0; i<  count; ++i)
> +        {
> +          const void *const addr = mmap (0, st.st_size, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE, fd, 0);

This line is too long as well.

> +# Start with a fresh gdb.
> +
> +gdb_exit
> +gdb_start
> +gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
> +gdb_load $binfile
> +
We can use "clean_restart" here.

> +proc one_test {count match_str} {
> +    global solib_binfile gdb_prompt

I don't find any usage of "gdb_prompt", we probably remove it.


Test cases work well in native GDB.  Does gdbserver have JIT debugging 
interface also?  If not, we probably should skip this test for remote 
mode or kfail it.

--
Yao Qi