This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [commit/Ada] Fix unconstrained packed array size
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011 04:24:26 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> I was afraid something like that might happen. I am pretty sure
> it is another one of these where the compiler is emitting incomplete
> debugging info (it works for me).
I expected something like that. In such case there should be XFAIL (or maybe
a different pseudo-FAIL variant but XFAIL seems OK to me) like we did in:
Re: Regression on gdb.ada/null_array.exp [Re: [patch] DW_AT_byte_size for array type entries]
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-11/msg00093.html
Could you best describe the difference - probably in readelf -wi output - that
can be checked by the .exp file for XFAIL?
> In the meantime, I still think it's worthwhile for the community
> if I add testcases whenever I can.
Yes, I find that part fine when we do not necessarily even increase the number
of FAILs messing up all the various testsuite cross-checks.
Thanks,
Jan