Re: [patch libiberty include]: Add additional helper functions for directory-separator searching

[Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>]

2011/3/8 DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>:
>
>> I think we don't need filename_dirchr, only filename_dirrchr.
>
> I see no harm in having both, for completeness, though. ?One could
> argue they should be in separate files, but they're trivial functions
> on non-dos-fs systems.
>
> What bothers me about this patch is that we're adding yet another set
> of functions that don't discriminate between the host filesystem, the
> target filesystem, and the build filesystem.
>

Ok, I got the point about having here implementations which can handle
both cases. So I added an additional argument to those functions to
specify for which file-system flavor is searched.
I don't see right now much use for this difference, but well, it won't
harm to have this ability too.

2011-03-12  Kai Tietz

	* filename.h (filename_dirchr_host): New macro.
	(filename_dirrchr_host): New macro.
	(filename_dirchr): New prototype.
	(filename_dirrchr): New prototype.

2011-03-12  Kai Tietz

	* filename_chr.c: New file.
	* Makefile.in (CFILES): Add filename_chr.c file.
	(REQUIRED_OFILES): Add filename_chr.o
	(filename_chr.o): New rule.
	* functions.texi: Regenerated.

Tested for x86_64-w64-mingw32, and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Ok for apply?

Regards,
Kai

Attachment: libiberty_dirsep.txt
Description: Text document