This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [try 2nd, patch] Move common macros to i386-dbg-reg.h


On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:05:00 +0200, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> It does, but before we do so, I think it's important to know how
> we are going to reduce this duplication. I haven't looked at the patch,
> so I can't comment on it, but I think we just need a plan of what and
> how we're going to avoid that.

So far I try (not too actively as I have to maintain primarily linux-nat) and
at least prefer the plan of Pedro as he posted it in:
	Re: [0/9]#2 Fix lost siginfo_t
	http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-08/msg00544.html

Therefore so far the plan seems clear to me, unless anyone disagrees.

The Yao's patches seem to support this general direction.



Thanks,
Jan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]