Re: [RFA] Typedef'd method parameters [2/4]

[Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>]

On 04/25/2011 02:06 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> This is pretty gross.

I did warn you! :-)

> There are some bits available in struct general_symbol_info:
>
>                 struct general_symbol_info {
>   /*   0   4 */    char * name
>   /*   4   4 */    union {...} value
>   /*   8   4 */    union {...} language_specific
>   /*  12   1 */    enum language language
>    /* XXX 8 bit hole, try to pack */
>   /*  14   2 */    short int section
>   /*  16   4 */    struct obj_section * obj_section
>                 }
>
> So, you could put a flag in there.
> That would be a lot cleaner.

I did not notice that. Thanks. I've added a flag for this.

Look for follow-up patches in response to Jan's remarks.

Keith