This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] canonical linespec and multiple breakpoints ...
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 13:18:13 -0600
- Subject: Re: [RFC] canonical linespec and multiple breakpoints ...
- References: <20110505162855.GA2546@adacore.com> <m3oc3gx48l.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83bozgmhil.fsf@gnu.org> <m3oc2pxjds.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83k4dcd1bh.fsf@gnu.org> <m3r56bdoh9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <m362nmarbv.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83fwmpqjem.fsf@gnu.org>
>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
Tom> I think I/T sets are also a good idea here
Eli> What is an "I/T set"?
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2008-08/msg00169.html
>> modify breakpoint N location LINESPEC
Eli> (As for the command name, I'd suggest "location N LINESPEC", btw.)
I wanted a way to also change the 'silent' flag.
It occurred to me last night that we could use "set" instead of
"modify":
set breakpoint N location LINESPEC
set breakpoint N silent [on|off]
Eli> You say nothing about watchpoints. Will they also use the same
Eli> infrastructure?
I don't think it is necessary. "watch" doesn't take a linespec
argument.
Tom