This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [rfc] Prompt memory management/cleanups


>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:

Pedro> You've asked for comments on the API, and IMO this makes for
Pedro> a weird API, because the caller of set_prompt needs to know
Pedro> whether set_prompt will take ownership of the pointer or not
Pedro> depending on where the pointer came from.  I haven't looked
Pedro> at the callers -- that's why I asked what would need to
Pedro> change.  :-)

The problem case is set_prompt(get_prompt()), but here the prompt code
already owns the pointer.  I guess it is a little weird, but it still
falls under the general rule of "you have to call get_prompt again to
get the prompt after set_prompt".

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]