This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Some Python ideas, looking for feedback
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Andrew Oakley <andrew at ado dot is-a-geek dot net>
- Cc: gdb at sourceware dot org, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:38:39 +0300
- Subject: Re: Some Python ideas, looking for feedback
- References: <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD0151D583A2@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> <201108161345.33448.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD0151D585D2@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> <20110817193710.59945561@ado-gentoo> <20110817201316.64fc14e5@ado-gentoo> <83sjozsuor.fsf@gnu.org> <20110817203525.6d789493@ado-gentoo>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:35:25 +0100
> From: Andrew Oakley <andrew@ado.is-a-geek.net>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> "Fixed" version:
>
> diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
> index 6e7bf52..c82173b 100644
> --- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
> +++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
> @@ -21575,7 +21575,8 @@ Each field is an object, with some pre-defined
> attributes: @item bitpos
> This attribute is not available for @code{static} fields (as in
> C@t{++} or Java). For non-@code{static} fields, the value is the bit
> -position of the field.
> +position of the field. For @code{enum} fields, the value is the
> +enumeration member's integer representation.
This version is fine, thanks.