This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: SEGV in dwarf2read.c -- gdb-7.2


>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:

Jan> I guess for performance reasons, the CU header read-in
Jan> vs. load_full_comp_unit is a big difference.  There are already
Jan> some PRs (such as 12828 (a)) where GDB needlessly expands too many
Jan> CUs "locking itself" by inacceptable performance.

Does the CU cache serve a useful purpose these days?
I wonder whether we could just remove it.

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]