This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 18/348] Fix -Wsahdow warnings

>>>>> "Andrey" == Andrey Smirnov <> writes:

Andrey> I know I probably should go to GCC mailing list and ask that question
Andrey> there, but anyways, would this patch cause gcc to stop generating the
Andrey> warning about local variable shadowing global one from system headers?

Yeah, that's what it does.

Andrey> I hope that kinds of shadowing would still be detectable even with this
Andrey> patch applied.

Why is that?

I do think the GCC patch could probably be better.  That is, I think a
slightly different rule would be an improvement, something like
"generally do not warn about shadowing things declared in system
headers, except if a local function pointer variable shadows a system
function".  That would eliminate the potential for some kinds of bugs.

Tom> Still, what it does is prevent the warning when shadowing something from
Tom> a system header. ÂThis seems decent to me and in particular will, I
Tom> think, largely address Mark's concerns.

Andrey> It would pretty much solve that problem, yes, but still it would
Andrey> divide patch submitters into two groups those who have newest gcc and
Andrey> -Wshadow enabled by default, and those who don't. And the people
Andrey> without -Wshadow enabled compilers would be, on occasion, breaking the
Andrey> build because they have no means to check for -Wshadow caused errors.
Andrey> I hope I missing something and it is not the case, but that how the
Andrey> things seems to me now.

Yes, I think it would result in some periodic breakage until the newer
GCC is widely distributed.  I'm willing to put up with that.  We already
put up with it, in a way, due to other GCC differences... see the
uninitialized variable patches or FORTIFY_SOURCE patches that go in from
time to time.

If the configury part is set up properly, then this warning will simply
auto-enable for people when they upgrade GCC.  So, it isn't like we'll
just forget about it; more like at some point we'll all be joining in :)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]