This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] A new command 'explore'
Thanks for taking a look Tom. My comments inline.
Siva> + ? ? ? ?raw_input("\nPress enter to return to parent value...")
Tom > The explorer seems to require a lot of enter-pressing.
Tom > To me it seems like this would get in the way.
Tom > I did not actually try it out, though.
I didn't find any better way than this to inform the user that
returning to the parent is the only possible thing to do.
Siva> + ? ? ? ?try:
Siva> + ? ? ? ? ? ?deref_value = value.dereference()
Siva> + ? ? ? ?except RuntimeError:
Tom > I think that it should be possible to catch gdb.MemoryError here.
Tom > That would be more precise.
OK. I will change to MemoryError. But I think just dereferencing does
not suffice here. There should be something else to try reading the
value: str(value.dereference()) ??
Tom > I didn't notice a way to explore a pointer that is really a decayed
Tom > array.
I will try to add something for this.
Siva> + ? ? ? ?array_range = value.type.range()
Siva> + ? ? ? ?if index < array_range or index > array_range:
Tom > I am not sure this will always do the right thing.
Tom > It seems possible to me for an array not to have a valid range.
I agree. I do know that it is not sufficient for many of the GCC data
structures. However, I couldn't think of a better compromise. How do
we convey to the user that he is going out of bounds? Is such a thing
required at all?? Let the user figure out the array bounds by some
Siva> + ? ?@staticmethod
Siva> + ? ?def get_type_from_str(type_str):
Siva> + ? ? ? ?try:
Siva> + ? ? ? ? ? ?# Assume the current language to be C/C++ and make a try.
Siva> + ? ? ? ? ? ?return gdb.parse_and_eval("(%s *)0" % type_str).type.target()
Tom > This is a nice trick.
This trick is not mine, it was suggested to me by Doug Evans.
Tom > If you have time, it would be nice to extend the API so that this trick
Tom > isn't needed. ?I think a type-parsing method would be useful.
Can I take a look at this after clearing this patch?