This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA take 5] Allow setting breakpoints on inline functions (PR 10738)


Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:56:41 +0100, Doug Evans wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > > with some more discussions about it Tom also shares this
> > > opinion. ?I think Google should just apply the provided patch
> > > downstream. ?Upstream/Gary should drop that
> > > --allow-incomplete-gdb-indexes option completely, incl. dropping
> > > the GDB code for backward compatibility with .gdb_index v4 and
> > > v5.
> > 
> > Setting aside Google's needs,
> > If I were allowed to decide, I would require v4,v5 compatibility
> > for at least one release.
> 
> So if it is officially a temporary compatibility additionally to
> --allow-smth-gdb-indexes GDB could print - if it finds out v4/v5
> .gdb_index:
> 
>   warning: Not using old .gdb_index v%d, rebuild it with this GDB version.
> 
> I have some doubts any user would ever use --allow-smth-gdb-indexes
> otherwise.

I'm happy to add such a message.

Cheers,
Gary

-- 
http://gbenson.net/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]