This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [commit] Do not rely on FIELD_LOC_KIND_BITPOS being zero

From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:05:35 +0200
Subject: Re: [commit] Do not rely on FIELD_LOC_KIND_BITPOS being zero
References: <20120417124410.GA15356@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F8D695E.7070002@redhat.com> <20120417131559.GA25248@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F8D76B7.90709@redhat.com> <20120417140122.GB28916@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F8D783C.3000501@redhat.com>

On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:03:40 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
> You're deeply confused if you think C++ invented getters/setters.

I never thought so and I never said so.  But C++ is the most easily applicable
getters/setters-featuring language to GDB.


Jan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [commit] Do not rely on FIELD_LOC_KIND_BITPOS being zero
  - From: Pedro Alves

References:
- [commit] Do not rely on FIELD_LOC_KIND_BITPOS being zero
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [commit] Do not rely on FIELD_LOC_KIND_BITPOS being zero
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: [commit] Do not rely on FIELD_LOC_KIND_BITPOS being zero
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [commit] Do not rely on FIELD_LOC_KIND_BITPOS being zero
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: [commit] Do not rely on FIELD_LOC_KIND_BITPOS being zero
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [commit] Do not rely on FIELD_LOC_KIND_BITPOS being zero
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]