This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [design change] record-replay linux ABI level


>>>>> "Oza" == oza Pawandeep <oza.pawandeep@gmail.com> writes:

Oza> I would have liked to think the same; but the way linux-record.h
Oza> addresses all the architecture, the enum sycall, is defiend
Oza> generically.

Oza> what I think is define it in arch files, as syscalls are partially
Oza> dependent on arch, though they follow posix standard.

Oza> so each arch file would have their own map, compare to current generic
Oza> map in linux-record.h

If it really makes things better, it is fine by me.

What do you propose to do with record_linux_system_call?


How about another approach?  Keep the current mapping idea, but extract
the mappings from syscalls/*.xml.  That way we help out two features
with a single data file.

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]