This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [SH] regs command

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Thomas Schwinge <thomas at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: brobecker at adacore dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, kevinb at redhat dot com, macro at codesourcery dot com
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 22:38:04 +0300
Subject: Re: [SH] regs command
References: <87ehqkrzzw.fsf@schwinge.name> <20120516142633.GV10253@adacore.com> <87zk98qe8t.fsf@schwinge.name>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 18:31:30 +0200
> 
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 07:26:33 -0700, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
> > > I therefore propose to remove sh_show_regs_command et al. from sh-tdep.c.
> > > If nobody objects, can it just go silently, or should invoking it then
> > > cause an error message, like ÂPlease use the Âinfo all-registersÂ command
> > > instead of ÂregsÂ.Â?
> > 
> > Make it an alias of "info reg" or "info all-registers", and make
> > the alias deprecated, so that users get a warning when they use it?
> > We can make that command deprecated for 7.5, and then remove it
> > from HEAD after 7.5 is branched, in a few weeks.
> 
> Sounds good, and thusly implemented, OK to commit?

The documentation parts are okay.  Thanks.

References:
- [SH] regs command
  - From: Thomas Schwinge
- Re: [SH] regs command
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [SH] regs command
  - From: Thomas Schwinge

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]