This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
@{width="10",alignment="-1",col_name="col1",colhdr="Description"@}], +body=[item=@{col0="processes",col1="Listing of all processes"@}, + item=@{col0="procgroups",col1="Listing of all process groups"@}, + item=@{col0="threads",col1="Listing of all threads"@}, + item=@{col0="files",col1="Listing of all file descriptors"@}, + item=@{col0="sockets",col1="Listing of all internet-domain sockets"@}, + item=@{col0="shm",col1="Listing of all shared-memory regions"@}, + item=@{col0="semaphores",col1="Listing of all semaphores"@}, + item=@{col0="msg",col1="Listing of all message queues"@}, + item=@{col0="modules",col1="Listing of all loaded kernel
I am afraid this output is not really good enough. From MI consumer standpoint, we need a clear and concise labels for each resource type. Unfortunately, "shm" is not acceptable at all. "Listing of all shared-memory regions" is unacceptably long. Besides, this would make a good title for a table with output, but not really good title for a menu used to specify what to show. For the record, here's the labels I have to use in actual UI code:
ResourceClassContributionItem_0=Processes ResourceClassContributionItem_10=Shared memory regions ResourceClassContributionItem_12=Semaphores ResourceClassContributionItem_14=Message queues ResourceClassContributionItem_16=Kernel modules ResourceClassContributionItem_2=Process groups ResourceClassContributionItem_4=Threads ResourceClassContributionItem_6=Files ResourceClassContributionItem_8=Sockets
Thanks, Volodya
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |