This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

[commit] [patch] Fix "ambiguous linespec" regression: break lineno

From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:16:51 +0200
Subject: [commit] [patch] Fix "ambiguous linespec" regression: break lineno
References: <20120608193958.GA10296@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87ehppczag.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120610190308.GA23551@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87sje198yq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:14:37 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I wonder if it would be cleaner as a flag to linespec.
> That's just speculation, please don't consider it an objection.
> I think you can go ahead as you like.

When I already wrote and hopefully finish the unification patch I just kept
this one to be "revert".

Checked in:
	http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-06/msg00077.html


Thanks,
Jan

References:
- [patch] Fix "ambiguous linespec" regression: break lineno
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch] Fix "ambiguous linespec" regression: break lineno
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [patch] Fix "ambiguous linespec" regression: break lineno
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch] Fix "ambiguous linespec" regression: break lineno
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]