This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Makefile.in includes linux-record.c to be common for all arch. (arm-reversible>phase-3)
please ind the latest patch which includes compilation of linux-record for ARM.
diff -urN orig/configure.tgt new/configure.tgt
--- orig/configure.tgt 2012-06-18 12:36:47.274501400 +0530
+++ new/configure.tgt 2012-06-18 12:31:47.335501400 +0530
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
arm*-*-linux*)
# Target: ARM based machine running GNU/Linux
gdb_target_obs="arm-tdep.o arm-linux-tdep.o glibc-tdep.o \
- solib-svr4.o symfile-mem.o linux-tdep.o"
+ solib-svr4.o symfile-mem.o linux-tdep.o linux-record.o"
build_gdbserver=yes
;;
arm*-*-netbsd* | arm*-*-knetbsd*-gnu)
ok to check in ?
Regards,
Oza.
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:13 PM, oza Pawandeep <oza.pawandeep@gmail.com> wrote:
> ok. It is clear now.
> shall incorporate linux-record where Yao suggested.
>
> Regards,
> Oza.
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Matt Rice <ratmice@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:20 AM, oza Pawandeep <oza.pawandeep@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ok. sure will add it there as it is not currently linking.
>>> but on the contrary 'record.o' is also under the same section
>>> COMMON_OBS, which is also not required where no record support.
>>> hence it is confusing.
>>
>> I think that because record.o implements gdb commands, we want
>> commands to be available universally
>> e.g. we want an error that support for a command is not available in a
>> build of gdb, rather than 'Undefined command.'
>>
>> where linux-record appears to be plumbing, thus not necessary.