This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Regression for -gstabs+ [Re: FYI: fix spelling of "delete" in c-exp.y]

From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 17:04:28 +0200
Subject: Re: Regression for -gstabs+ [Re: FYI: fix spelling of "delete" in c-exp.y]
References: <87k3z4pdzg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120619104843.GA22015@host2.jankratochvil.net> <877gv3pf4g.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:09:51 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Why are we spending any time at all on stabs and C++?  IIRC that never
> really worked that well, and stabs are past obsolete.

If we understand why is it as it is (currently I do not) I have no problem
with anything about stabs.  -gstabs+ already had/has many other C++ failures.

I will also look at it more.

Thanks,
Jan

References:
- FYI: fix spelling of "delete" in c-exp.y
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Regression for -gstabs+ [Re: FYI: fix spelling of "delete" in c-exp.y]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: Regression for -gstabs+ [Re: FYI: fix spelling of "delete" in c-exp.y]
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]