This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Saturday 11 August 2012 13:52:24 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> > > so it seems like finish *does* secretly accept options, but in this case > > it's trying to be secret about it rather than someone just didn't fully > > document it. or i read the "arg" parsing logic above incorrectly. > > Isn't that the case of "finish &" ? i'm not familiar with async behavior in gdb. is it something that applies to all commands, or just to a select few ? if the latter, should we still document it in the usage string ? Usage: finish [&] if the former, seems weird that every command would parse it itself ... -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |