This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Testsuite regression gdb.cp/converts.exp [Re: [RFA] gdb/13483]

From: Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org ml" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:38:12 -0700
Subject: Re: Testsuite regression gdb.cp/converts.exp [Re: [RFA] gdb/13483]
References: <5041274D.1050508@redhat.com> <87ehm9evyb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <504E2438.6020701@redhat.com> <20120911054549.GA25093@host2.jankratochvil.net>

On 09/10/2012 10:45 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:

on CentOS-5:

  Running gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/converts.exp ...
-PASS: gdb.cp/converts.exp: continue to breakpoint: end of main
[...]
-PASS: gdb.cp/converts.exp: p foo3_2 (1,1)
+gdb compile failed, gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/converts.cc: In function 'int main()':
+gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/converts.cc:81: warning: the address of 'int foo1_7(bool)', will always evaluate as 'true'
+UNTESTED: gdb.cp/converts.exp: converts.exp

My guess is an older compiler. Since none of these function calls is really necessary (well, one probably is necessary to make sure foo1_7 isn't optimized away), I propose just deleting the offending line.

What do you think?
Keith

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Testsuite regression gdb.cp/converts.exp [Re: [RFA] gdb/13483]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

References:
- Re: [RFA] gdb/13483
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [RFA] gdb/13483
  - From: Keith Seitz
- Testsuite regression gdb.cp/converts.exp [Re: [RFA] gdb/13483]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]