This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] new tracepoint downloaded MI notification.
- From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Cc: Yao Qi <yao at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:50:29 +0000
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] new tracepoint downloaded MI notification.
- References: <1348793347-12556-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1348793347-12556-3-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <5065E1E9.5040204@redhat.com> <5065E292.4000606@redhat.com> <506701EC.7040703@codesourcery.com> <509166FD.3050805@redhat.com> <5091C383.1080705@codesourcery.com> <5093EAE2.4090301@redhat.com>
On 11/02/2012 03:46 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> > FAOD, we should continue to use {number, location number}, and it requires improvement of breakpoint re-setting, correct?
> Yes. Though AFAICS, current notifications and commands use 'number="N.M"', not '{number, location number}'.
And FAOD, The "yes" was for the first question. I'm not sure what you meant by
"it", but the notification should not be blocked by that.
Let me grok the responses on the usefulness of the notification though (and
continue the discussion there, if necessary).
--
Pedro Alves