This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [4/10] RFC: unconditionally include signal.h

From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:18:20 +0000
Subject: Re: [4/10] RFC: unconditionally include signal.h
References: <87obiyzns7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87mwyiy8hi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

On 15-11-2012 19:24, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I think that checking for signal.h is pointless, because gdb already
> includes it unconditionally in various places -- e.g., utils.c.

It's not pointless in gdbserver.  The HAVE_SIGNAL_H checks were added for
the WinCE port.  See fe7cf52e.

-- 
Pedro Alves

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [4/10] RFC: unconditionally include signal.h
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [4/10] RFC: unconditionally include signal.h
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- [0/10] RFC: use gnulib more heavily + more configure fixes
  - From: Tom Tromey
- [4/10] RFC: unconditionally include signal.h
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]