This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thursday 20 December 2012 00:03:21 Joel Brobecker wrote: > > what i mean is worrying about the flow of code. if they aren't both > > GPLv2 based, i now have to worry about people being able to make the > > claim that i'm committing GPLv3 sim code to the GPLv2 kernel and > > tainting it. considering the code in question, doing GPLv3 on it will > > gain nothing. > > I have relayed the above to the FSF. thanks > > > I don't understand exactly the status of this file. Can I just > > > regenerate the "reverted" version and the project will still work? > > > > next time someone runs `aclocal` (like me), it'll blow away your > > changes as it copies m4 macros from files in /usr/share/ and into the > > aclocal.m4. > > I ran aclocal myself, and it blew away more than just my change, > but the entire block of code. Does it mean that only you are able > to regenerate this file properly? do you have pkg-config installed ? you'd need that (since it provides pkg.m4) in order for `aclocal` to work in the bfin subdir. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |