This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] record-full.h: rename record_ into record_full_
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:52:30 +0100, markus.t.metzger@intel.com wrote:
> --- a/gdb/amd64-linux-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/amd64-linux-tdep.c
[...]
> @@ -1203,8 +1203,9 @@ amd64_linux_syscall_record (struct regcache *regcache)
> regcache_raw_read_unsigned (regcache,
> amd64_linux_record_tdep.arg2,
> &addr);
> - if (record_arch_list_add_mem (addr,
> - amd64_linux_record_tdep.size_ulong))
> + if (record_full_arch_list_add_mem
> + (addr,
> + amd64_linux_record_tdep.size_ulong))
Needless line wrap, it can be then:
(addr, amd64_linux_record_tdep.size_ulong))
> return -1;
> }
> goto record_regs;
[...]
> --- a/gdb/arm-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
> @@ -12601,13 +12601,14 @@ arm_process_record (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct regcache *regcache,
> if (0 == ret)
> {
> /* Record registers. */
> - record_arch_list_add_reg (arm_record.regcache, ARM_PC_REGNUM);
> + record_full_arch_list_add_reg (arm_record.regcache, ARM_PC_REGNUM);
> if (arm_record.arm_regs)
> {
> for (no_of_rec = 0; no_of_rec < arm_record.reg_rec_count; no_of_rec++)
> {
> - if (record_arch_list_add_reg (arm_record.regcache ,
> - arm_record.arm_regs[no_of_rec]))
> + if (record_full_arch_list_add_reg
> + (arm_record.regcache ,
> + arm_record.arm_regs[no_of_rec]))
again:
(arm_record.regcache, arm_record.arm_regs[no_of_rec]))
> ret = -1;
> }
> }
[...]
> --- a/gdb/i386-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/i386-tdep.c
[...]
> @@ -5726,7 +5726,7 @@ Do you want to stop the program?"),
> case 0xdf:
> if (0xe0 == ir.modrm)
> {
> - if (record_arch_list_add_reg (ir.regcache, I386_EAX_REGNUM))
> + if (record_full_arch_list_add_reg (ir.regcache, I386_EAX_REGNUM))
Exceeds 80 columns.
> return -1;
> }
> else if ((0x0f == ir.modrm >> 4) || (0x0e == ir.modrm >> 4))
[...]
> for (i = I387_XMM0_REGNUM (tdep);
> i386_xmm_regnum_p (gdbarch, i); i++)
> - record_arch_list_add_reg (ir.regcache, i);
> + record_full_arch_list_add_reg (ir.regcache, i);
>
> if (i386_mxcsr_regnum_p (gdbarch, I387_MXCSR_REGNUM(tdep)))
> - record_arch_list_add_reg (ir.regcache, I387_MXCSR_REGNUM(tdep));
> + record_full_arch_list_add_reg (ir.regcache, I387_MXCSR_REGNUM(tdep));
Exceeds 80 columns.
>
> for (i = I387_ST0_REGNUM (tdep);
> i386_fp_regnum_p (gdbarch, i); i++)
> - record_arch_list_add_reg (ir.regcache, i);
> + record_full_arch_list_add_reg (ir.regcache, i);
>
[...]
> --- a/gdb/linux-record.c
> +++ b/gdb/linux-record.c
[...]
> @@ -156,10 +156,11 @@ record_linux_msghdr (struct regcache *regcache,
> /* msg_name msg_namelen */
> addr = extract_unsigned_integer (a, tdep->size_pointer, byte_order);
> a += tdep->size_pointer;
> - if (record_arch_list_add_mem ((CORE_ADDR) addr,
> - (int) extract_unsigned_integer (a,
> - tdep->size_int,
> - byte_order)))
FYI this was the usual indentation (I cannot find a rule for it) - rightmost,
indented under the opening parenthesis; record.c just rather used some more
non-standsrd style.
Not much a problem as record.c if full of this style you used here:
> + if (record_full_arch_list_add_mem
> + ((CORE_ADDR) addr,
> + (int) extract_unsigned_integer (a,
> + tdep->size_int,
> + byte_order)))
> return -1;
> a += tdep->size_int;
>
[...]
> @@ -1940,8 +1962,9 @@ Do you want to stop the program?"),
> ULONGEST maxevents;
>
> regcache_raw_read_unsigned (regcache, tdep->arg3, &maxevents);
> - if (record_arch_list_add_mem ((CORE_ADDR) tmpulongest,
> - maxevents * tdep->size_epoll_event))
> + if (record_full_arch_list_add_mem ((CORE_ADDR) tmpulongest,
> + maxevents *
> + tdep->size_epoll_event))
Multi-line expressions should use parentheses and operators should be at the
beginning of lines, therefore:
# + if (record_full_arch_list_add_mem ((CORE_ADDR) tmpulongest,
# + (maxevents
# + * tdep->size_epoll_event)))
http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#Formatting
# but Emacs would alter it. Adding a set of parentheses produces something that looks equally nice, and which Emacs will preserve:
#
# v = (rup->ru_utime.tv_sec*1000 + rup->ru_utime.tv_usec/1000
# + rup->ru_stime.tv_sec*1000 + rup->ru_stime.tv_usec/1000);
> return -1;
> }
> break;
[...]
Thanks,
Jan