Re: [patch]: Replace stryoul call to fetch address

[Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>]

On 02/27/2013 08:05 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> Just to be a little less terse: The quoted email is me commenting on the
> fact that someone submitted a patch which "#if 0"ed some code.  I was
> commenting on the '#if 0' not on the fact that cygwin's signal handling
> with gdb is broken.  AFAIK, it is working.  If it isn't working then I
> would never suggest that ripping out code was the right solution.

I was actually thinking of this:

 http://www.sourceware.org/ml/cygwin-developers/2007-02/msg00052.html

and IIRC some other messages on the cygwin lists in the past I
had found at the time of that question.  But it's useless to look
for them.

So you're saying that Cygwin actually does output the "cYgSiGw00f"
stuff nowadays?

-- 
Pedro Alves