This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFC: fix PR c++/9197
- From: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:52:16 -0700
- Subject: Re: RFC: fix PR c++/9197
- References: <87d2xcvjny dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <20130203052021 dot GA16948 at host2 dot jankratochvil dot net> <87wquo11ej dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <20130206195920 dot GA2797 at host2 dot jankratochvil dot net> <87y5dxpryn dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <CADPb22QYpJaeUaWT9JZ1hT7+QM-wNBkBq0absFyXQT76zQ=BdA at mail dot gmail dot com> <87ppyu9lrn dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <CADPb22S2=9eUaSdELQwGeqsKZoksNdQ98KFsf0veQ99_UOgESQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <87d2uu9jf6 dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans <dje@google.com> writes:
>
> Doug> Getting back to another thing I said, can we take this opportunity to
> Doug> give it one?
>
> If you mean that I should fix this in order to get this patch in, then
> no, I don't think so. Just my initial foray into this uncovered a lot
> of oddities.
>
> If you mean adding a comment, I can do that:
I think the relative probabilities of what I might have meant should
be extraordinarily clear. :-)
[I meant the latter.]