This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: m32r sim was Re: one week to gdb-7.6 release?
- From: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at oarcorp dot com>
- To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>, Ralf Corsepius <ralf dot corsepius at rtems dot org>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, "palves at redhat dot com" <palves at redhat dot com>, "jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com" <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:50:22 -0500
- Subject: Re: m32r sim was Re: one week to gdb-7.6 release?
- References: <20130320160032 dot GC5447 at adacore dot com> <51553AA8 dot 8020705 at rtems dot org> <5155A93E dot 3050509 at oarcorp dot com> <201303291230 dot 37045 dot vapier at gentoo dot org> <20130329164237 dot GL4758 at adacore dot com>
On 3/29/2013 11:42 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
Looking back at 7.5.91, I see that m32r unconditionally uses
dv-sockser.o and
I don't know how it built before.
[...]
Thank you again, guys, for being of top of it. Let's hope we are
getting to the bottom of things...
I have to admit that the number of iterations and the amount of
research/testing needed in order to try to get this right is
making me slightly nervous. Nothing we can do about it for
this release. But for future releases, Ralf & Joel, do you think
you could incorporate some regular testing of the HEAD on your
end? It would allow us to spot those issues during the development
cycle, and give the fixes more time to mature, rather than putting
them in at the last second...
I have been testing the head fairly regularly but not all of these
combinations and not on mingw.
Do you have some idea of testing requirements?
Thanks!
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985