This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix display of structures/bitfields in register description.
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "Tedeschi, Walfred" <walfred dot tedeschi at intel dot com>, "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:59:34 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix display of structures/bitfields in register description.
- References: <1366812163-27865-1-git-send-email-walfred dot tedeschi at intel dot com> <87wqrrn7ki dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <AC542571535E904D8E8ADAE745D60B191838D2B8 at IRSMSX104 dot ger dot corp dot intel dot com> <87fvyek9ec dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com>
They have a different header because they're supposed to be embedded
in things that run on the target which are not necessarily
GPL-compatible. I figured out with the FSF what an appropriate notice
would be for that case. I'd generally rather we use that notice for
all target XML files, even in the testsuite, to prevent someone
copying the GPL'd version into something by accident - not a big deal,
though.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
> Walfred> Copyrights:
> Walfred> I took a look on several xml files and all of them had the same
> Walfred> copyright I have used. Though, would you recommend to use the
> Walfred> common GPL header?
>
> I don't know why the other .xml files have this other header.
> However, seeing as the new file is in the test suite, I think the plain
> GPL comment is preferable.
>
> Tom
--
Thanks,
Daniel