This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix display of structures/bitfields in register description.
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- Cc: "Tedeschi\, Walfred" <walfred dot tedeschi at intel dot com>, "gdb-patches\ at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 08:47:38 -0600
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix display of structures/bitfields in register description.
- References: <1366812163-27865-1-git-send-email-walfred dot tedeschi at intel dot com> <87wqrrn7ki dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <AC542571535E904D8E8ADAE745D60B191838D2B8 at IRSMSX104 dot ger dot corp dot intel dot com> <87fvyek9ec dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <CAN9gPaE+u63cCBX3kmo=WosPbQQNcuP4O9od7LHaVQTDuUAw1g at mail dot gmail dot com>
>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
Daniel> They have a different header because they're supposed to be embedded
Daniel> in things that run on the target which are not necessarily
Daniel> GPL-compatible. I figured out with the FSF what an appropriate notice
Daniel> would be for that case. I'd generally rather we use that notice for
Daniel> all target XML files, even in the testsuite, to prevent someone
Daniel> copying the GPL'd version into something by accident - not a big deal,
Daniel> though.
It is totally fine with me.
Thanks for explaining this.
Tom