This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 07/05/2013 10:29 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 20:22:18 +0800 From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> CC: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>BTW: 1, It looks like I can't set a breakpoint on a function with is __stdcall calling convention When I type: (gdb) b Add_S Function "Add_S" not defined. In fact, the symbol name about "Add_S" function is "Add_S@8", (This can be seen from the disassembler) I don't know how to set such breakpoint by function names.I am not an expert on windows, but it is a bug to me.What exactly do you see as a bug here?
We can't set breakpoint on 'Add_S' in current GDB, (gdb) b Add_S Function "Add_S" not defined. Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) IMO, It is expected that 'b Add_S' can set a breakpoint on Add_S. -- Yao (éå)
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |