This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 4/5] powerpc64-aix ptrace64 when defined.
- From: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: Raunaq 12 <raunaq12 at in dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich dot Weigand at de dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 11:53:44 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] powerpc64-aix ptrace64 when defined.
- References: <CAGWvnynVeLt6F-QREsP_CtQvwvtZgwqHxtcS6pn58LMf=AX=GA at mail dot gmail dot com> <OF4E4883FF dot 74E1DEB7-ON65257BC5 dot 003D5DFF-65257BC5 dot 0042150F at in dot ibm dot com>
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Raunaq 12 <raunaq12@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> The earlier version of this patch was using ptrace64 only if BFD64 was
> defined,
> i.e. when GDB was built in 64 BIT mode.
> Did you build 32 bit gdb?
> If so, according to the previous version of this patch,
> no ptrace related calls were changed as ptrace64 was only
> called if BFD64 was defined. Could you please resend the error you got
> while debugging
> 32 bit GCC to my mail id? I can look into it to see where the problem is
> coming from.
I have not tried to build GDB with the latest test of patches. When I
used the earlier patches to build GDB in 32 bit mode but with
--enable-64-bit-bfd (because I want to debug 64 bit applications), and
tried to use the debugger with GCC, I encountered the problem that no
function call argument values were available.
Thanks, David