This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: guile scripting for gdb
- From: ludo at gnu dot org (Ludovic CourtÃs)
- To: Doug Evans <xdje42 at gmail dot com>
- Cc: guile-user at gnu dot org, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:55:12 +0100
- Subject: Re: guile scripting for gdb
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAA8o+=QH-gHc2GoUadfhOO4hj0=mxRbC6u0CDijAsYRvWpzvyw at mail dot gmail dot com> <87ob5vlr2s dot fsf at gnu dot org> <CAA8o+=Qhwj720CtfhUF=JuLs-GJ455uZ7gsRRripc=4vZDFWng at mail dot gmail dot com> <87k3gfpz7k dot fsf at gnu dot org> <CAP9bCMQVz1X_DnNQYQzEY4RnY6wCbUbjeO-T0MDtu=xO0FFBpQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <m34n7jqwoq dot fsf at seba dot sebabeach dot org>
Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com> skribis:
> Doug Evans <xdje42@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Ludovic CourtÃs <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>>> Doug Evans <dje@sebabeach.org> skribis:
>>>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Ludovic CourtÃs <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>>>>> As discussed on IRC, one possible issue is eq?-ness of SMOBs: one would
>>>>> usually expects pointer equality to be preserved at the Scheme level.
>
> I uploaded to my github repo a branch with a prototype of implementing
> this for gdb symbols.
>
> https://github.com/dje42/gdb.git
> branch: eq-smobs
Excellent.
Ludoâ.
PS: It may be possible to do away with mark/free procedures if targeting 2.0
and later:
<http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=guile.git;a=commitdiff;h=aaa9ef33d8ace7c3060fa05c9a8bc64434616476>.