This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: [PATCH] Add MIPS UFR support
- From: Andrew Bennett <Andrew dot Bennett at imgtec dot com>
- To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>, "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Steve Ellcey <Steve dot Ellcey at imgtec dot com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:02:28 +0000
- Subject: RE: [PATCH] Add MIPS UFR support
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <0DA23CC379F5F945ACB41CF394B982774C8579 at LEMAIL01 dot le dot imgtec dot org> <201311300357 dot 23710 dot vapier at gentoo dot org> <0DA23CC379F5F945ACB41CF394B982774DAC91 at LEMAIL01 dot le dot imgtec dot org> <0DA23CC379F5F945ACB41CF394B982774E7990 at LEMAIL01 dot le dot imgtec dot org> <20131219043738 dot GF3493 at adacore dot com> <0DA23CC379F5F945ACB41CF394B982774E7FCD at LEMAIL01 dot le dot imgtec dot org> <20131219105920 dot GG3493 at adacore dot com>
>> I am happy to add a copyright header to this file. However, I can only
>> find three assembler files in the sim/testsuite/sim directory that contain
>> a copyright header (two of these are mips tests). I was therefore wondering
>> if it is better to follow the prior art and not contain a header? I don't
>> know the history here, so would someone be able to advise me?
>
> In this case, we've had clear directions from the FSF that new files
> should always have a copyright header. The lack of header in other
> files is a potential issue which we'd like to solve, if we had the
> time (to do the research)... But, in the meantime, making sure that
> new files have the header allows us to at least not make things worse.
Thats great. Many thanks for clarifying this.
Regards,
Andrew