This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: [PATCH][PR python/17364] Cleanup registration of __gdb_builtin_type_bound128 pretty-printer
- From: "Tedeschi, Walfred" <walfred dot tedeschi at intel dot com>
- To: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- Cc: "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 06:56:25 +0000
- Subject: RE: [PATCH][PR python/17364] Cleanup registration of __gdb_builtin_type_bound128 pretty-printer
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <yjt21tqn7jvk dot fsf at ruffy dot mtv dot corp dot google dot com> <AC542571535E904D8E8ADAE745D60B192F92CA48 at IRSMSX104 dot ger dot corp dot intel dot com> <CADPb22TBPdF9dMmbYXhoS98V_YeU0hY50qfYJwDKxb=6Mk0ioA at mail dot gmail dot com>
Hello Doug,
I will prepare a patch as soon as I have some cycles.
Thanks and regards,
-Fred
-----Original Message-----
From: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Doug Evans
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 6:23 PM
To: Tedeschi, Walfred
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][PR python/17364] Cleanup registration of __gdb_builtin_type_bound128 pretty-printer
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Tedeschi, Walfred <walfred.tedeschi@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> I have also submitted a patch for this last week. Though I was not creating a new directory for pretty printers.
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-09/msg00867.html
>
> I would like though to understand a bit more your comment on having x86 on the name of the register. What is the purpose of that?
> (I could change it in case)
Imagine a multi-arch gdb with several arches having bounds registers.
How do we distinguish them in the pretty-printer namespace?
> About registration of the pretty printer. We could do the following:
> 1. Register an event listener for new obj_files.
> 2. Query at every event the architecture of the inferior. (In case we
> had an event new_inferior loaded it would be cheaper.) 3. In case of x86 or amd64 we can then register the pretty-printer for the bound registers.
We could do something like that for 7.9 alright.
At the moment it feels like a bit of overkill just for one pretty-printer.
And for 7.8.1 I want to do something simple.
Intel GmbH
Dornacher Strasse 1
85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Lamprechter, Hannes Schwaderer, Douglas Lusk
Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456
Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895
Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052