Re: [PATCH 2/5] ARM: extract_arm_insn function need to read instrs correctly in be8 case

[Victor Kamensky <victor dot kamensky at linaro dot org>]

On 21 October 2014 00:54, Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Victor Kamensky <victor.kamensky@linaro.org> writes:
>
>> Fix is to change gdbarch_byte_order to gdbarch_byte_order_for_code,
>> when passed to extract_unsigned_integer that reads instruction.
>> ---
>>  gdb/ChangeLog  | 5 +++++
>>  gdb/arm-tdep.c | 2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
>> index c967a93..2aef5dc 100644
>> --- a/gdb/ChangeLog
>> +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
>> @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
>> +2014-10-13  Victor Kamensky  <victor.kamensky@linaro.org>
>> +
>> +     * arm-tdep.c (extract_arm_insn): use dbarch_byte_order_for_code
>> +     to read arm instruction.
>> +
>>  2014-09-30  Don Breazeal  <donb@codesourcery.com>
>>
>>       * inf-ptrace.c (inf_ptrace_follow_fork): Remove target-independent
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> We don't include the ChangeLog changes in the patch, because that will
> cause conflicts when applying your patch locally in the review.
> Instead, we include ChangeLog entries in the commit messages, see
> https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/ContributionChecklist#Properly_formatted_commit_messages

Thanks! It is good pointer. I have not seen it before.
Maybe gdb/CONTRIBUTE could mention this wiki page.

I will move all proposed commit ChangeLogs as per wiki,
will incorporate review comments and repost updated series.

Thanks,
Victor

> --
> Yao (éå)