This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

ping: [patchv2] Fix 100x slowdown regression on DWZ files


On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 17:56:53 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 01:51:38 +0200, Doug Evans wrote:
> I tested this patch with --target_board=dwarf4-gdb-index
> and got a failure in m-static.exp:

That is particularly with -fdebug-types-section.


> Type units read the line table in a separate path,

OK, therefore I dropped that separate struct dwarf2_lineinfo
and reused struct line_header instead.


> OTOH, I do want to avoid any confusion that this patch may inadvertently
> introduce. For example, IIUC with your patch as is,
> if we read a partial_unit first, before a compile_unit
> that has the same stmt_list value, we'll do more processing in
> dwarf_decode_lines than we really need to since we only need a file
> number to symtab mapping. And if we later read in a compile_unit
> with the same stmt_value we'll call dwarf_decode_lines again,
> and this time we need the pc/line mapping it computes.
> Whereas if we process these in the opposite order we'll only call
> dwarf_decode_lines once. I'm sure this will be confusing at first
> to some later developer going through this code.
> [I could be missing something of course, and I'm happy for any corrections.]

Implemented (omitting some story why I did not include it before).


> The code that processes stmt_list for type_units is in setup_type_unit_groups.
> Note that this code goes to the trouble of re-initializing the buildsym
> machinery (see the calls to restart_symtab in dwarf2read.c) when we process
> the second and subsequent type units that share a stmt_list value.
> This is something that used to be done before your patch and will no
> longer be done with your patch (since if we get a cache hit we exit).
> It may be that the type_unit support is doing this unnecessarily,
> which would be great because we can then simplify it.

I hope this patch should no longer break -fdebug-types-section.
If it additionally enables some future optimization for -fdebug-types-section
the better.


>  > +  /* Offset of line number information in .debug_line section.  */
>  > +  sect_offset offset;
>  > +  unsigned offset_in_dwz : 1;
> 
> IWBN to document why offset_in_dwz is here.
> It's not obvious why it's needed.
+
On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 01:57:03 +0200, Doug Evans wrote:
> Ah, I guess the offset_in_dwz flag will ensure dwarf_decode_lines gets called
> twice regardless of order.  But is that the only reason for the flag?

I have added there now:
+  /* OFFSET is for struct dwz_file associated with dwarf2_per_objfile.  */

If one removes it regressions really happen.  What happens is that this
line_header_hash (former lineinfo_hash) is in struct dwarf2_per_objfile which
is common for both objfile and its objfile.dwz (that one is normally in
/usr/lib/debug/.dwz/ - common for multiple objfiles).  And there are two
different DIEs at offset 0xb - one in objfile and one in objfile.dwz - which
would match single line_header if offset_in_dwz was not there.

Also existing dwarf2read.c code usually transfers "dwz flag" together with DIE
offset, such as:
	dwarf2_find_containing_comp_unit (sect_offset offset,
					  unsigned int offset_in_dwz,
					  struct objfile *objfile)
This reminds me - why doesn't similar ambiguity happen also for dwp_file?
I am unfortunately not much aware of the dwp implementation details.


>  > -      struct line_header *line_header
>  > -	= dwarf_decode_line_header (line_offset, cu);
>  > +      dwarf2_per_objfile->lineinfo_hash =
> 
> As much as I prefer "=" going here, convention says to put it on the
> next line.

I have changed it but this was just blind copy from existing line 21818.


>  > +	htab_create_alloc_ex (127, dwarf2_lineinfo_hash, dwarf2_lineinfo_eq,
> 
> I don't have any data, but 127 seems high.

I have not changed it but this was just blind copy from existing line 21818.


> I wouldn't change it, I just wanted to ask if you have any data
> guiding this choice.

Tuning some constants really makes no sense when GDB has missing + insanely
complicated data structures and in consequence GDB is using inappropriate data
structures with bad algorithmic complexity.  One needs to switch GDB to C++
and its STL before one can start talking about data structures performance.


No regressions on {x86_64,x86_64-m32,i686}-fedora20-linux-gnu in DWZ mode and
in -fdebug-types-section mode.


Thanks,
Jan
gdb/
2014-10-02  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>

	Fix 100x slowdown regression on DWZ files.
	* dwarf2read.c (struct dwarf2_per_objfile): Add line_header_hash.
	(struct line_header): Add offset and offset_in_dwz.
	(dwarf_decode_lines): Add parameter decode_mapping to the declaration.
	(free_line_header_voidp): New declaration.
	(line_header_hash, line_header_eq): New functions.
	(dwarf2_build_include_psymtabs): Update dwarf_decode_lines caller.
	(handle_DW_AT_stmt_list): Use dwarf2_per_objfile->line_header_hash.
	(free_line_header_voidp): New function.
	(dwarf_decode_line_header): Initialize offset and offset_in_dwz.
	(dwarf_decode_lines): New parameter decode_mapping, use it.

diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2read.c b/gdb/dwarf2read.c
index 9d0ee13..206dc10 100644
--- a/gdb/dwarf2read.c
+++ b/gdb/dwarf2read.c
@@ -309,6 +309,9 @@ struct dwarf2_per_objfile
 
   /* The CUs we recently read.  */
   VEC (dwarf2_per_cu_ptr) *just_read_cus;
+
+  /* Table containing line_header indexed by offset and offset_in_dwz.  */
+  htab_t line_header_hash;
 };
 
 static struct dwarf2_per_objfile *dwarf2_per_objfile;
@@ -1025,6 +1028,12 @@ typedef void (die_reader_func_ftype) (const struct die_reader_specs *reader,
    which contains the following information.  */
 struct line_header
 {
+  /* Offset of line number information in .debug_line section.  */
+  sect_offset offset;
+
+  /* OFFSET is for struct dwz_file associated with dwarf2_per_objfile.  */
+  unsigned offset_in_dwz : 1;
+
   unsigned int total_length;
   unsigned short version;
   unsigned int header_length;
@@ -1513,7 +1522,7 @@ static struct line_header *dwarf_decode_line_header (unsigned int offset,
 
 static void dwarf_decode_lines (struct line_header *, const char *,
 				struct dwarf2_cu *, struct partial_symtab *,
-				CORE_ADDR);
+				CORE_ADDR, int decode_mapping);
 
 static void dwarf2_start_subfile (const char *, const char *, const char *);
 
@@ -1845,6 +1854,8 @@ static void free_dwo_file_cleanup (void *);
 static void process_cu_includes (void);
 
 static void check_producer (struct dwarf2_cu *cu);
+
+static void free_line_header_voidp (void *arg);
 
 /* Various complaints about symbol reading that don't abort the process.  */
 
@@ -1911,6 +1922,29 @@ dwarf2_invalid_attrib_class_complaint (const char *arg1, const char *arg2)
 	     _("invalid attribute class or form for '%s' in '%s'"),
 	     arg1, arg2);
 }
+
+/* Hash function for line_header_hash.  */
+
+static hashval_t
+line_header_hash (const void *item)
+{
+  const struct line_header *ofs = item;
+
+  return ofs->offset.sect_off ^ ofs->offset_in_dwz;
+}
+
+/* Equality function for line_header_hash.  */
+
+static int
+line_header_eq (const void *item_lhs, const void *item_rhs)
+{
+  const struct line_header *ofs_lhs = item_lhs;
+  const struct line_header *ofs_rhs = item_rhs;
+
+  return (ofs_lhs->offset.sect_off == ofs_rhs->offset.sect_off
+	  && ofs_lhs->offset_in_dwz == ofs_rhs->offset_in_dwz);
+}
+
 
 #if WORDS_BIGENDIAN
 
@@ -4449,7 +4483,7 @@ dwarf2_build_include_psymtabs (struct dwarf2_cu *cu,
     return;  /* No linetable, so no includes.  */
 
   /* NOTE: pst->dirname is DW_AT_comp_dir (if present).  */
-  dwarf_decode_lines (lh, pst->dirname, cu, pst, pst->textlow);
+  dwarf_decode_lines (lh, pst->dirname, cu, pst, pst->textlow, 1);
 
   free_line_header (lh);
 }
@@ -8975,24 +9009,64 @@ static void
 handle_DW_AT_stmt_list (struct die_info *die, struct dwarf2_cu *cu,
 			const char *comp_dir, CORE_ADDR lowpc) /* ARI: editCase function */
 {
+  struct objfile *objfile = dwarf2_per_objfile->objfile;
   struct attribute *attr;
+  unsigned int line_offset;
+  struct line_header *line_header, line_header_local;
+  unsigned u;
+  void **slot;
+  int decode_mapping;
 
   gdb_assert (! cu->per_cu->is_debug_types);
 
   attr = dwarf2_attr (die, DW_AT_stmt_list, cu);
-  if (attr)
+  if (attr == NULL)
+    return;
+
+  line_offset = DW_UNSND (attr);
+
+  if (dwarf2_per_objfile->line_header_hash == NULL)
     {
-      unsigned int line_offset = DW_UNSND (attr);
-      struct line_header *line_header
-	= dwarf_decode_line_header (line_offset, cu);
+      dwarf2_per_objfile->line_header_hash
+	= htab_create_alloc_ex (127, line_header_hash, line_header_eq,
+				free_line_header_voidp,
+				&objfile->objfile_obstack,
+				hashtab_obstack_allocate,
+				dummy_obstack_deallocate);
+    }
 
-      if (line_header)
-	{
-	  cu->line_header = line_header;
-	  make_cleanup (free_cu_line_header, cu);
-	  dwarf_decode_lines (line_header, comp_dir, cu, NULL, lowpc);
-	}
+  line_header_local.offset.sect_off = line_offset;
+  line_header_local.offset_in_dwz = cu->per_cu->is_dwz;
+  slot = htab_find_slot (dwarf2_per_objfile->line_header_hash,
+			 &line_header_local, NO_INSERT);
+
+  /* For DW_TAG_compile_unit we need info like symtab::linetable which
+     is not present in *SLOT.  */
+  if (die->tag == DW_TAG_partial_unit && slot != NULL)
+    {
+      gdb_assert (*slot != NULL);
+      cu->line_header = *slot;
+      return;
+    }
+
+  line_header = dwarf_decode_line_header (line_offset, cu);
+  if (line_header == NULL)
+    return;
+  cu->line_header = line_header;
+
+  slot = htab_find_slot (dwarf2_per_objfile->line_header_hash,
+			 &line_header_local, INSERT);
+  gdb_assert (slot != NULL);
+  if (*slot == NULL)
+    *slot = line_header;
+  else
+    {
+      gdb_assert (die->tag != DW_TAG_partial_unit);
+      make_cleanup (free_cu_line_header, cu);
     }
+  decode_mapping = (die->tag != DW_TAG_partial_unit);
+  dwarf_decode_lines (line_header, comp_dir, cu, NULL, lowpc,
+		      decode_mapping);
 }
 
 /* Process DW_TAG_compile_unit or DW_TAG_partial_unit.  */
@@ -16863,6 +16937,16 @@ free_line_header (struct line_header *lh)
   xfree (lh);
 }
 
+/* Stub for free_line_header to match void * callback types.  */
+
+static void
+free_line_header_voidp (void *arg)
+{
+  struct line_header *lh = arg;
+
+  free_line_header (lh);
+}
+
 /* Add an entry to LH's include directory table.  */
 
 static void
@@ -16993,6 +17077,9 @@ dwarf_decode_line_header (unsigned int offset, struct dwarf2_cu *cu)
   back_to = make_cleanup ((make_cleanup_ftype *) free_line_header,
                           (void *) lh);
 
+  lh->offset.sect_off = offset;
+  lh->offset_in_dwz = cu->per_cu->is_dwz;
+
   line_ptr = section->buffer + offset;
 
   /* Read in the header.  */
@@ -17605,18 +17692,23 @@ dwarf_decode_lines_1 (struct line_header *lh, const char *comp_dir,
    E.g. expand_line_sal requires this when finding psymtabs to expand.
    A good testcase for this is mb-inline.exp.
 
-   LOWPC is the lowest address in CU (or 0 if not known).  */
+   LOWPC is the lowest address in CU (or 0 if not known).
+
+   Boolean DECODE_MAPPING specifies we need to fully decode .debug_line
+   for its PC<->lines mapping information.  Otherwise only filenames
+   tables is read in.  */
 
 static void
 dwarf_decode_lines (struct line_header *lh, const char *comp_dir,
 		    struct dwarf2_cu *cu, struct partial_symtab *pst,
-		    CORE_ADDR lowpc)
+		    CORE_ADDR lowpc, int decode_mapping)
 {
   struct objfile *objfile = cu->objfile;
   const int decode_for_pst_p = (pst != NULL);
   struct subfile *first_subfile = current_subfile;
 
-  dwarf_decode_lines_1 (lh, comp_dir, cu, decode_for_pst_p, lowpc);
+  if (decode_mapping)
+    dwarf_decode_lines_1 (lh, comp_dir, cu, decode_for_pst_p, lowpc);
 
   if (decode_for_pst_p)
     {

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]