This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: path to find libcc1.so?
- From: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 11:57:35 -0800
- Subject: Re: path to find libcc1.so?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <83mw6sq941 dot fsf at gnu dot org> <CADPb22SpZAozZmtq+QMwndmi2mZpD2QF221ZpLSszr0cS0+gEw at mail dot gmail dot com> <20141213185647 dot GA14208 at host2 dot jankratochvil dot net>
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 01:22:38 +0100, Doug Evans wrote:
>> I was reading the new "compile" code and a question occurred to me.
>> Do we want to give the user a parameter to specify the path of libcc1.so?
>> (say if it's in a non-standard location)
>> Or is the plan to tell users to use existing mechanisms
>> (LD_LIBRARY_PATH, et.al.)?
>
> It is assumed + I use $LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
>
> I find the GDB compile project is at much too early stage than to care about
> this.
Early adopters and those who want to contribute may find it preferable
to use, e.g., ~/.gdbinit.
If this is something we eventually want to do, doing it now will help
people we want/need.
Plus it's, what, 10 lines of (real) code?