This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: GDB 7.9 release update
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- Cc: brobecker at adacore dot com, dje at google dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, pmuldoon at redhat dot com, arnez at vnet dot linux dot ibm dot com
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 20:45:27 +0200
- Subject: Re: GDB 7.9 release update
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20150127043704 dot GB4697 at adacore dot com> <CADPb22Q=zLiKYjbAPk=qkh9b3VjmJB7ou8f4tz0shWHnYePR=g at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150129045344 dot GC5193 at adacore dot com> <54D0DA28 dot 9080500 at redhat dot com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 15:24:40 +0100
> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> CC: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>, arnez@vnet.linux.ibm.com
>
> On 01/29/2015 05:53 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>
> > I am also wondering if we should also wait for...
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17837 ... or not.
> > Pedro, I see you've been kind enough to start looking into this
> > (bugzilla papertrail). What do you think? Blocker, not blocker?
>
> I'm not sure. I haven't fully understood what the scripts in
> question are doing and how the issue triggers. I've asked Jan
> if he could come up with a simplified reproducer. Hopefully we'll
> have a better idea soon.
>
>
> There was also this:
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-01/msg00703.html
>
> The issue there is that with both remote and record targets, GDB
> can get messed up after 'query'. That's a regression compared
> to 7.8.
>
> I think I'll go push that series to master ASAP. I'll wait for
> feedback on the plan before pushing into 7.9 though.
Can we please solve the TUI slow display on MS-Windows? Two patches
were proposed, can we please commit one of them?
TIA