This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Do not consider reference types as dynamic


On 04/20/2015 04:27 PM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote:
Joel and I discussed this live: doing the type printing change is
probably the best way in terms of "implementation consistency", but it's
also going to be a lot of work.

So the plan is instead to try to enhance type resolution to handle
references that are not addressable. In the meantime, I've reverted my
patches so that the regression disappears. I'll submit another patch...

The patch series Joel submitted last Tuesday[1] solves the original issue: the plan I was talking about is actually implemented by these patches! So there's no need to go further on this matter.

[1] <https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-04/msg00768.html>

--
Pierre-Marie de Rodat


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]